Northwoods resident, Troy Hester, asked me to share the following letter he received from representative Cynthia McKinney. It details her views on illegal immigration laws being discussed in Congress and gives her reason for voting against the ‘‘Border Protection, Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005.

As I attend events throughout the District and constituents participate in our monthly District Days, I am hearing the opinions of many constituents on the current national debate on immigration law. Last December, the House of Representatives passed HR 4437, the Border Protection, Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005. I was one of 182 Democrats and Republicans to vote against this mean-spirited ~ counterproductive bill. HR 4437 would, among other things, make it a felony to be undocumented in this country.

With the exception of Native Americans, who can trace their ancestry on this soil to antiquity, all of us are immigrants. HR 4437 would turn individuals and families who have been in this country for years working, and paying taxes, into criminals literally overnight. About 92% of undocumented immigrant men in this country hold jobs, compared with 83% of native-born men. Undocumented immigrants now account for nearly 5% of the entire U.S. labor force, and account for 1.5% of total wages in this country. Criminalizing and deporting millions of undocumented immigrants is not only beyond the current capacity of local law enforcement, it could hurt our economy.

In 1986, President Reagan signed the Immigration Reform Control Act a bill intended to close the “back door” on illegal immigration by sanctioning employers who hire undocumented workers, and tripling the number of border patrols by 2002. Yet the number of undocumented immigrants has since risen from 3 million to an estimated 11 to 12 million today. The law failed because it did not effectively address employer demand for employing undocumented workers, which has remained high. Too many American employers are all too happy to employ undocumented workers for below minimum wages, often in subhuman work conditions, in order to lower their cost of production while circumventing labor regulations.

Unions oppose HR 4437 because it will push undocumented workers further into the black market, worsening labor conditions for both documented and undocumented workers. Local law enforcement opposes HR 4437 because it undermines their ability to deal with hard crime. Criminalizing undocumented workers will push more of them to turn to illicit activities such as prostitution and the drug trade to derive an income. This, in turn, would lead to the greater development of organized crime in this country.

HR 4437 is another example of a simplistic solution to a complex problem, and it will only make things worse. I will be monitoring this issue closely as the Senate debates immigration reform, and involve a better process of earned legalization without excessive wait time~;It would also involve a better and broader system of issuing temporary visas to accommodate U..S..employers’ demand for immigrant labor, as President Bush called for in 2004.

Whatever one’s views on America’s immigration policy, I think everyone can agree it’s an important issue–particularly in Doraville, a city with so many people from different backgrounds.

Special Note: this text has been edited from what was originally posted on the neighborhood e-mail lists. By request, I have removed references to some of councilman Anavitarte’s personal matters.

The following conversation between Doraville councilwoman Marlene Hadden and state representative Jill Chambers was published on several Doraville mailing lists today. For me, the two most interesting pieces of this exchange are Hadden’s belief that councilman Jason Anavitarte will distance himself from Chambers’ Democratic opponent (Rob Roche), and also that we get a first glimpse of the Chambers camp’s talking points against that opponent (“Roche is divorced, has poor finances, a ponytail!”)

Here is the beginning of the thread–an e-mail from councilwoman Hadden:

From: Marlene
To: jillchambers@msn.com
Cc: DZAQ@XXX; yrinfo@XXX
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 3:19 PM
Subject: Jason&Opponent

Has long talk w/Jason last night. I believe he will shy away from endorsing Roche. He is building excuses to stay away from Democratic Party [ ... ]

Also, I do not think he likes Roche’s leanings or looks – ponytail. I think he knows he has been burned by his association w/Hart and it’s starting to coming back on him from more than just those who were initially disappointed about him & Brian. He is not anxious to get involved in something that may cost him mayoral votes next year.

I told him I was staying as far away from Roche as possible. The guy may be desperate as it appears his finances are not great-mortgaged to the hilt on his house, divorced, child pmts.

Let Chris and Alan know and will start letting it out to those we can trust that this guy is a looser. How lucky you are to have such a jerk for an opponent. Also, to let him talk to them if he calls on them so we can see what he is saying. Even to the point of leading him on a bit. We may want to hold back on a few yard signs just to suck him in and then put them in after we get the info?

We will be ready to help.

That e-mail was followed up by one from Chambers:

From: “Jill Chambers”
Date: 2006/04/13 Thu PM 10:35:09 EDT
To: Marlene
Subject: Re: Jason&Opponent

thanks for the good news regarding Jason not endorsing Roche. I’ve invited Jason to join the Repub party since he is turning out to be such a strong fiscal conservative! the situation with the other councilman is being talked about all over North Dekalb – especially after the story in the paper today (good photo of you on www.ajc.com

I hope John & Steve called you back by now.

I believe the “Eric” mentioned in the e-mail below is Chamblee mayor, Eric Clarkson:

From: Marlene
To: Jill Chambers
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 10:39 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Jason&Opponent

gracias-haven’t seen the paper yet-saw Eric at Vintage this evening. He seems still a little upset you did not endorse him. I emphasized you did not endorse Evelyn. Kissy, kissy and he will be ok. Jill, you are great (period) I love you and keep on keepin’ on. Marlelne

And a very quick response from representative Chambers:

From: “Jill Chambers”
Date: 2006/04/13 Thu PM 10:49:30 EDT
To:
Subject: Re: Re: Jason&Opponent

waaa – I still have the mailer where Eric endorsed my first opponent!!! maybe I’ll make him a copy to remind him….(ha ha, just kidding). Besides, Eric won without my formal endorsement in the same year when my endorsement of Brian did not help him one bit in his runoff!!

here is the AJC link with the photo:

http://www.ajc.com/news/content/metro/dekalb/stories/0413doraville.html

One of the things I find most interesting about this exchange is that councilwoman Hadden forwarded the entire thing to several local activists (myself not included) with this cryptic message:

Who is moving Doraville forwar? If you want, please post. Thanks.

Strange. I wonder what the perceived benefit of having this conversation published all over several yahoo groups and the web is. If nothing else, this is an interesting glimpse into North Dekalb politics and political machinations.

Hidden in the comments of an open thread at the Blog for Democracy were some interesting tidbits for Doraville voters:

  • In the first quarter of 2006, Jason Anavitarte raised no money for a state house race against Jill Chambers
  • In fact, a commenter further down says that Jason has pulled out of the race entirely, and that a newcomer named Rob Roche is currently the only announced Democratic candidate
  • The speculation is that Jason plans to run for Mayor of Doraville when Ray Jenkins’ term is up in a couple of years. Here’s what one commenter says:
    Well, no Latino Senators anyway. Anivitarte is going to run for Mayor of Doraville and I’m pretty sure he’ll win. Assuming that, he would be well positioned to run against Dan Weber when that seat turns Democratic in a few years.

  • Interesting! I was wondering why I hadn’t seen an Anavitarte campaign site–now I know! This is probably a smart (if calculating) move on Jason’s part, as I think Jill Chambers is going to be a formidable opponent in any election.

    What bothers me is how the 81st district is getting another no-name candidate who I (and probably most Doraville residents) have never heard of. This should be a competetive district for Democrats, let’s see if the party gets its act together so that Doraville’s citizens can have a real choice in November.

    Thanks to Decaturguy for the tip on this story.